In this contempt proceeding before the High Court of Orissa, the Court dropped the proceeding as the opposite parties had rejected the petitioner's prayer and implemented the previous order. The petitioner was advised to file a fresh writ application challenging the impugned order.
Contempt proceeding dropped; liberty to file fresh writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.9776 of 2023
Trilochan Dash
..... Petitioner
Represented By Adv. - Prasanta Kumar Mishra
-versus-
Anu Garg, I.A.S and others ..... Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. – Mr. N.K. Praharaj, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER
09.05.2024
Order No.
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Signature Not Verified
S.K. Rout
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTANU KUMAR ROUT Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 13-May-2024 13:03:24
Page 1 of 1.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding should be retained given that the opposite parties have rejected the petitioner's prayer and implemented the previous order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Trilochan Dash
Anu Garg, I.A.S and others
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Santanu Kumar Rout
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
