The Court disposed of a contempt petition by directing the Tahasildar to reopen the demarcation case and complete it within four months, with permission to take police assistance if necessary.
Direction to reopen demarcation case and complete within four months with police assistance if necessary; contempt proceeding dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.6089 of 2022
Sonali Raul
-versus-
Choudhuri Pragyananda Das, Tahasildar, Erasama
…. Opposite Party
Mr. S. Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 1.5.2024
Order No.
M.K. Panda
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 03-May-2024 16:24:45
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the demarcation process should be reopened and completed within a specified timeframe?
Sonali Raul
Choudhuri Pragyananda Das, Tahasildar, Erasama
B. P. Routry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
