Sanatan Jena v. Jyotikanta Bhujabal, O.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
The contempt application filed by the petitioner against the respondent, a Tahasildar, was dismissed for default in the absence of any representation on its behalf.
The contempt application filed by the petitioner against the respondent, a Tahasildar, was dismissed for default in the absence of any representation on its behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.5372 of 2022
Sanatan Jena …. Petitioner None -versus…. Jyotikanta Bhujabal, OAS, Tahasildar, Opposite Party Vyasanagar, Jajpur Road
None
Mr. Saswat Das, AGA
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
23.08.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
M. Panda
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 30-Aug-2024 18:43:59
Sanatan Jena
Jyotikanta Bhujabal
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
M. Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court