Contempt petition disposed of on submission that the impugned order was complied with via a speaking order.
Liberty to question the correctness of the speaking order before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 5255 of 2024
Bhagyabati Mallik
…. Petitioner
Mr. D.N. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
Aswathy S., IAS, Commissioner-cumSecretary to Government, S&ME Deptt.
…. Opposite Party
Ms. Suman Pattanaik, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
06.09.2024
01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
submitted that the order of this Court, violation of which has been
alleged in the present contempt petition, has been complied with by passing a speaking order.
disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to question the correctness of the said order before the appropriate forum/authority
in accordance with law.
Signature Not Verified
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
Digitally Signed Signed by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRA Designation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Arun Mishra Date: 10-Sep-2024 11:30:54
Bhagyabati Mallik
Aswathy S.
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Arun Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
