This court dropped a contempt proceeding initiated in connection with an earlier writ petition regarding land encroachment, finding the order was substantially complied with despite the petitioner's complaint about lack of notice.
Contempt proceeding dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No. 4423 of 2024
Jayanta Kumar Rout …. Petitioner
Mr. P. K. Praharaj, Advocate
-versus-
Kshetramohan Swain
…. Opposite Party Mr. L. Samantaray, A.G.A.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No.
10.07.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
“The Petitioners’ representation (Annexure-3) shall be examined by the Tahasildar, Athagarh (Opposite Party No.2) after notice to the Petitioners and the encroachers named in the Annexure-3 and giving them a hearing, a reasoned order shall be passed thereon not later than 1st June, 2023. The said order be communicated to the Parties within a week thereafter. The Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view in the matter.
2. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.”
Page 1 of 2
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Subhalaxmi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 11-Jul-2024 19:18:35
Page 2 of 2
Jayanta Kumar Rout
Kshetramohan Swain
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
