Contempt application alleging violation of a prior court order. The contemnors' counsel stated the order had been complied with by passing a speaking order, rendering the application infructuous. The Court disposed of the application and dropped the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.4266 of 2022
Sangita Tripathy
…. Petitioner
Mr. N.S. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Saswat Mishra, IAS, Commissioner- …. Opposite Parties cum-Secretary, Higher Education Department and another
Mr. Saswat Das, A.G.A.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
02.08.2024
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
Signature Not Verified
Ashok/ Secy. Digitally Signed Signed by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRA Designation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 13-Aug-2024 11:54:10
Sangita Tripathy
Saswat Mishra, IAS, Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Higher Education Department
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
