In a contempt petition alleging violation of a prior court order, the petitioner counsel stated at the bar that the order was complied with. The Court disposed of the petition on this statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 367 of 2024
Anama Patel
…. Petitioner
M/s. B.K. Behera, Advocate & Associates
-versus-
Alok Kar, Director (R&R) & Ex- …. Opposite Parties Officio, Additional Secretary to Government, Department of Water Resources and another
Mr. L. Samantray, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
16.04.2024
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
S. Behera
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 18-Apr-2024 10:57:15
Anama Patel
Alok Kar
Murahari Sri Raman
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
