In this contempt application, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Orissa held that it was not inclined to proceed with the petition five years after the impugned order was passed. The contempt proceeding was accordingly dropped.
The contempt proceeding is dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 2522 of 2019
Kumudini Rana
…. Petitioner
M/s S.N. Mishra & associates, Advocates
-versus-
Vijay Amruta Kulange, Collector, Ganjam
…. Opposite Party
Mr. B. Dash, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
06.12.2024
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
Arun/Ashok
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR JAGADEB MOHAPATRA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 12-Dec-2024 12:41:18
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding can be heard more than five years after the passing of the interlocutory order.
Kumudini Rana
Vijay Amruta Kulange
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
