In contempt proceedings filed for violation of a prior order alleging non-reply and non-action, the opposite party submitted that the order was complied with. Contempt proceedings were dropped and the matter disposed of.
Contempt proceedings dropped; case disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.1234 of 2024
Bijay Kumar Behera
…. Petitioner
Mr. Tapan Kumar Jena Samanta, Advocate
-versus-
…. Atanu Mohanty, Authorized officer, Opposite Party/Contemnor ICICI Bank Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Mr. Rama Chandra Panigrahi, Advocate for ICICI Bank
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
06.03.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASWINI KUMAR SETHY Designation: Personal Assistant (Secretary-in-charge) Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTA Aswini/S.K.Jena,Secy. CK Date: 07-Mar-2024 10:57:04
(M.S.Raman) Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Atanu Mohanty
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Bijay Kumar Behera
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Murahari S Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
