Nirupama Roul v. Padma Ch.Ray
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for restoration of CRP No.34 of 2011, disposed of on 31.07.2017. None appeared for the petitioner; the Court dismissed the restoration application for non-prosecution.
Application for restoration of CRP No.34 of 2011, disposed of on 31.07.2017. None appeared for the petitioner; the Court dismissed the restoration application for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.389 of 2017
Nirupama Roul …. Petitioner
None
…. Padma Charan Ray and others Opposite Parties None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No. 01.
ORDER 23.09.2024
to prosecute the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application.
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Laxmikant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Sep-2024 18:22:03
Page 1 of 1
Nirupama Roul
Padma Charan Ray and others
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court