Bail application under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 419, 420 IPC and 66(C)/66(D) IT Act. Counsel submitted the trial concluded and the petitioner was acquitted on 27.02.2024, making the application infructuous; the court dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.798 of 2024
Md.Afjal Ansari
… Petitioner
Mr.Amit Ranjan Padhi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Judhisthir Sahoo, Advocate
vs.
State of Orissa
Opposite Party
Ms.S.Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
01.03.2024
Order No.
(Through hybrid mode)
Case No.1825 of 2023, pending in the Court of the learned J.M.F.C. (L.R.
& L.T.V.), Berhampur, registered for commission of offences under Sections 419, 420 of IPC and Section 66 (C)/66 (D) of Information Technology Act, 2000.
Sahoo, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meanwhile
trial has been completed and judgment has been delivered on 27.02.2024
Page 1 of 2
and the petitioner has been acquitted for which this bail application has become infructuous.
………………………...
Bichi
(SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BICHITRANANDA SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 02-Mar-2024 14:09:22
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application remained necessary after the petitioner was acquitted in the pending trial.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Md. Afjal Ansari
State of Orissa
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
