Two bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. against NDPS Act charges were heard together. Counsel withdrew the applications, granting liberty to renew them in the trial court without prejudice to the High Court's liberty.
Liberty granted to renew bail prayer before Trial Court; BLAPLs disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.7644 of 2024
Kamal Lochan Behera
Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Nanda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
BLAPL No.7697 of 2024
Parsuram Lalit
Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER
28.08.2024
Order No.
01. 1. Since both the matters arise out of Orkel P.S. Case No.34 of 2023, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order on the consent of the parties.
Page 1 of 3
Court of learned Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri, arising out of Orkel P.S. Case No.34 of 2023 , for commission of alleged offences under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act.
Page 2 of 3
SLP(Crl.) No.4648 of 2024 dated 28.05.2024 and considering the period of detention.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
SOUMYA
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 29-Aug-2024 15:39:40
Page 3 of 3
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to renew bail applications or dispose of the withdrawn bail applications.
The effect of non-support by independent witnesses on the bail reconsideration by the trial court.
The effect of the Apex Court judgment in SLP(Crl.) No.4648 of 2024 on the present bail applications.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ankur Chaudhary vs. State of Madhya PradeshReferred¶31
Ankur Chaudhary vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kamal Lochan Behera
Parsuram Lalit
State of Orissa
V. Narsingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
