The High Court of Orissa directed the petitioner, an accused in a POCSO case, to be released on bail. The decision was based on the completion of the victim's examination and the period spent in custody, subject to specific conditions.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail on terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 524 of 2024
Dinesh Mahar
Petitioner
Mr. B.B. Routray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, SC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
Order No.
23.02.2024
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Ayesha
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 23-Feb-2024 20:18:26
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a POCSO case after the examination of the victim.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Dinesh Mahar
State of Odisha
V. Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
