Disposed¶9

Nabin Mahanta v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC16 Aug 2024BLAPL/4835/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application (BLAPL) dismissed in effect; bail refused at this stage by High Court of Orissa (Justice V. Narasingh, 16.08.2024) in S.T. Case No.59 of 2022 / Barkot P.S. Case No.120 of 2022 under Sections 498-A/302/34 IPC; earlier bail rejected under Section 439 Cr.P.C by Sessions Judge, Deogarh on 19.03.2024; liberty to renew prayer after examination of parents of deceased; direction to expedite trial; custody since 18.03.2022.

What did the court decide?

Considering the nature of allegation and the deposition of the witnesses, the Court is not inclined to entertain the Petitioner's bail application at this stage. ¶6

Nabin Mahanta Vs State of Odisha — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No. 4835 of 2024

¶3

Nabin Mahanta

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr. S.R. Das, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha

¶8

…. Opposite Party

¶9

Mr. P.K. Mohanty, ASC

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

16.08.2024

Order No.

03.

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶16

The Petitioner is an accused in S.T. Case No.59 of 2022 pending on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Deogarh arising out of Barkot P.S. Case No.120 of 2022 for commission of the alleged offence under Sections 498-A/302/34 of IPC.

¶17

Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. Case is pending in any other Court.

¶18

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s. 439 Cr.P.C by the learned Sessions Judge, Deogarh by order dated 19.03.2024

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

¶21

This is the second journey of Petitioner to this Court. Earlier the bail application of the Petitioner was disposed of by order dated 20.12.2022 in BLAPL No.10642 of 2022.

¶22

Considering the nature of allegation and taking into account the deposition of the witnesses, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application of the Petitioner at this stage.

¶23

Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to renew his prayer before the learned Court in seisin after examination of the parents of the deceased.

¶24

Since the Petitioner is stated to be in custody from 18.03.2022 for almost two years and five months, learned Court in seisin is requested to expedite the trial.

¶25

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶26

(V. NARASINGH)

¶27

Ayesha

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Aug-2024 20:28:56

¶30

Page 2 of 2

Nabin Mahanta v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nabin Mahanta v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dipak Kumar Nayak@ Raza Vs State of Odisha

Sankuru @ Manoj Dalai Vs State of Odisha

Artabandhu Banchhor Vs State of Odisha

Yash Gaikwad Vs State of Odisha

Mahabir Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Deba Oram Vs State of Odisha