The High Court granted bail to two petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving sections 302/307/34 IPC. The court considered the long period of detention and trial delays before directing release on terms deemed just by the trial court.
Release of the two petitioners on bail on such terms and conditions as the trial court deems just and proper.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.4139 of 2024
Mangal Sinku and Another …. Petitioners Mr. P.S. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. K.K. Das, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER
7.8.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
examined in the meantime and one witness is dead. It is further stated that trial was delayed due to non-attendance of witnesses and now it is fixed to 29th August, 2024 for evidence of investigating officers.
M.K. Panda
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 08-Aug-2024 16:07:56
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners pending the conclusion of their trial.
Whether the delay in completing the trial justifies release on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mangal Sinku
Satari Munda
State of Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
