Prasanta Mukhi v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
高院驳回了关于将本案发回完整审判期间暂时释放当事人的保释申请，因案情已实质性推进。尽管如此，法院指示审理法院在六个月内完成审判，否则当事人可再次申请保释。
What did the court decide?
The bail application is rejected and the trial court is directed to complete the trial within six months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL NO.4076 OF 2024
Prasanta Mukhi …. Petitioners
Represented By Adv.
-Mr. Jyotirmaya Sahoo.
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Represented By Adv. -Mr. Pradipta Satapathy, ASC.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA
ORDER
Order No.
03.12.2024
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed given that the trial has substantially progressed and five witnesses have been examined.
Whether the trial Court should be directed to complete the trial within a specified period to justify holding the Petitioner on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prasanta Mukhi
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
A.C. BEHERA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court