Disposed

Sangram Swain v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC2 Aug 2024BLAPL/3475/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners accused in a murder case sought bail after the trial court rejected their Section 439 Cr.P.C. application. Noting that examined witnesses had not supported the prosecution, the High Court declined to entertain the bail plea without the trial court considering that evidence and allowed renewal before it.

What did the court decide?

No bail granted; liberty to renew bail prayer before the trial court on the basis of new trial evidence.

Sangram Swain Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No. 3475 of 2024

¶3

1. Sangram Swain

¶4

….

¶5

Petitioners

¶6

2. Budhia Swain

¶7

Mr. A. Dash, Advocate

¶8

-versus-

¶9

State of Odisha

¶10

…. Opposite Party

¶11

Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC

¶12

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

[

ORDER

02.08.2024

Order No.

03.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶19

The Petitioners are accused in connection with S.T. Case No.34 of 2023, pending on the file of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kodala, Ganjam arising out of Kabisuryanagar P.S. Case No.198 of 2022 , for alleged commission of offences under Sections 302/120-B/34 of IPC.

¶20

Learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPLs, no other bail application of the Petitioners are pending in any other Court, relating to the aforesaid P.S. Case.

¶21

Being aggrieved by the rejection of their application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned

¶22

Page 1 of 2

¶23

Additional Sessions Judge, Kodala, by order dated 20.12.2023 in the aforementioned cases, the present BLAPLs have been filed.

¶24

This is the second journey of the Petitioner No.2 (Budhia Swain) to this Court. Earlier the bail application of the said Petitioner was rejected by order dated 27.09.2023 in BLAPL No.1323 of 2023.

¶25

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that in the meanwhile, during the currency of trial, material witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution.

¶26

Taking note of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application of the Petitioners at this stage without having the benefit of consideration of the said evidence by the learned Court in seisin.

¶27

Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to renew their prayer before the learned Court in seisin on the basis of the evidence which has come to the fore.

¶28

In the event such an application is filed, learned Court in seisin shall consider the same on its own merit.

¶29

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶30

(V. NARASINGH) Ayesha Judge

¶31

Signature Not Verified Ayesha

¶32

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 05-Aug-2024 10:41:40

¶33

Page 2 of 2

Sangram Swain v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangram Swain v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lokanath Rana Vs State of Odisha

Jeet Nayak@Tulu@Sanjay Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Sarat Kumar Bag Vs State of Odisha

Om Prakas Pasi Vs State of Odisha

Bhagaban Swain Vs State of Odisha

Pintu Bisoyi Vs State of Odisha