Allowed

Sidhant Patra v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC15 Jul 2024BLAPL/2735/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO case involving alleged kidnapping and rape. The court, considering the nature of offences, victim's evidence and prolonged pre-trial custody since November 2022 without expressing any opinion on merits, admitted the petitioner to bail on conditions including fortnightly police reporting.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on Rs.50,000 bond with two solvent sureties, subject to conditions including fortnightly police attendance reporting for six months.

Sidhant Patra Vs State of Odisha — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.2735 of 2024

¶2

Sidhant Patra

¶3

Petitioner

¶4

Mr. D. Sethi, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Orissa

¶7

… Opposite Party

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

¶10

ORDER(ORAL) 15.07.2024

¶11

Order No.

¶12

04.

¶13

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

¶14

This is the second bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Pandapada P.S. Case No.155 of 2022 corresponding to Special Case No.415 of 2022 pending in the file of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge-cum-Spl. Judge under POCSO Act, Keonjhar, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.363/ 366/ 341/ 323/ 376(2)(n)/ 376(3)/ 294 of IPC read with Section 6 of POCSO Act, on the allegation of kidnapping the victim and committing rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault by keeping her in confinement.

¶15

Heard, Mr. Digambar Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.K. Praharaj, learned SC in the present matter and perused the record. 4. Mr. Digambar Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner apprises this Court that this is the second bail

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

application of the petitioner, but no bail application of the petitioner is pending before any other forum except this one. Similarly, Mr. T.K. Praharaj, learned SC also apprises this Court that the victim in this case has already been informed, but none appears for the victim to oppose the bail application of the victim.

¶18

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offences, so also the evidence of the victim, which is being supplied by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the form of deposition of the victim and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 11.11.2022, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits of the case admits the petitioner to bail. 6. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

¶19

(i) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

¶20

(ii) the petitioner in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the

¶21

Page 2 of 3

¶22

Petitioner for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law and

¶23

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case by giving his present address of stay.

¶24

(iv) the petitioner shall report attendance before the jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on 2^nd Sunday of each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of his release from the custody.

¶25

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

¶26

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioner in future for similar/grave offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

¶27

(G. Satapathy) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Judge

¶28

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Jul-2024 17:04:53 Subhasmita

¶29

Page 3 of 3

Sidhant Patra v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sidhant Patra v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sabyasachi Mohanty Vs Minati Nayak

Santosh Kumar Sahu Vs Subham Kumar Sahu

Pathi Gadang Vs State of Odisha

Somanath Das Vs State of Odisha

Raja Nayak @ Babu Vs State of Odisha

Biswas Naik Vs State of Odisha