Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator. On consent of counsel for both sides, the Court appointed a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes, with arbitration under the aegis of the High Court of Orissa Arbitration Centre, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARBP No. 84 of 2023
Karunakar Routray
…. Petitioner
Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi, Advocate -Versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. Arnav Behera, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
04.09.2024
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Signature Not Verified Chief Justice
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication SK Jena/Secy. Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 10-Sep-2024 11:47:34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Karunakar Routray
State of Odisha
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
