Petition under Section 11(6) seeking appointment of an arbitrator for infrastructure/commercial disputes. The opposite party did not appear despite service. The Court appointed a sole arbitrator and directed proceedings before the High Court of Orissa Arbitration Centre, disposing of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARBP No. 38 of 2023
Suresh Chandra Mishra
…. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
…. Erstwhile Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Party Bhubaneswar
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
08.
18.09.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
arbitration proceedings shall take place under the aegis of the High Court of Orissa Arbitration Centre.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
S. Behera
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Sep-2024 17:19:52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) to adjudicate disputes between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Chandra Mishra
Erstwhile Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
