Anticipatory bail application in a job-fraud cheating case. The court declined anticipatory bail but directed that if the petitioner surrenders within three weeks, the trial court shall release her on bail, subject to verification of criminal antecedents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.8964 of 2024
Sushila Haldar
.....
Petitioner
Represented By Adv. -
Prasanta Kumar Nanda
-versus-
State Of Odisha
.....
Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. – D.Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER
29.08.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 2 .
account of the present petitioner.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge
Anil
Page Signature Not Verified 2 of 2 . Digitally Signed Signed by: ANIL KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 30-Aug-2024 17:04:23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner falsely implicated in a job-fraud cheating case should be granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sushila Haldar
State Of Odisha
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
