A one-line order dismissing an anticipatory bail application. The High Court of Orissa refused bail citing the seriousness and gravity of the alleged excise offences.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.1942 of 2024
Prasanta Kumar Das
…. Petitioner
Mr. P. Beura, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party Mr. S. Patra, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
09.04.2024
Case No.64 of 2024 pending in the court of learned JMFC(R), Cuttack.
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
AKPradhan Digitally Signed Signed by: ANANTA KUMAR PRADHAN Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORI SSA Date: 11-Apr-2024 13:46:29
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in apprehension of arrest for alleged involvement in excise offences?
Whether the seriousness of the charges warrants refusal of bail?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prasanta Kumar Das
State of Odisha
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
