Mukesh Birganthia v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the ABLAPL for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear, leading to the interim order ceasing to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.13913 OF 2021
Mukesh Birganthia …. Petitioners Mr.A.K. Budhia, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party, Mr. S.K. Nayak, AGA
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 21.03.2024
Order No.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Himansu Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 22-Mar-2024 17:46:08
Page 1 of 1
Mukesh Birganthia
State of Odisha
D. DASH
HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court