The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution because the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted having no instructions in the matter, despite having been given sufficient opportunities to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.12809 of 2022
Ananda Gupta & Others
…. Petitioners
Mrs. Chandana Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. B.P. Pradhan, Advocate (Informant) Mr. G.R. Rout, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
Order No.
01.02.2024
(D. Dash) Judge
H
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 07-Feb-2024 16:08:13
Ananda Gupta & Others
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
