Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file a future application. The High Court allowed the prayer and disposed of the petition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file appropriate application in future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.45 of 2023
Dillip Kumar Baral ..……. Petitioner
Mr. Anup Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate
-Versus-
Rasmi Ranjan Prusty, Officer-in-Charge,
Balanga Police Station, Puri & others ..……. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
19.04.2023
Order No. 01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Mr. A.K. Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner has submitted that because of the defect, the petitioner has instruction to withdraw the writ petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate application in future.
3. Prayer stands allowed.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty reserved to
the petitioner to file the appropriate application.
5. A memo in this regard, filed by Mr. Mohapatra, learned
counsel, is taken on record.
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Subhasis
2
3
Dillip Kumar Baral
Rasmi Ranjan Prusty
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
