Petitioner sought direction to produce the victim girl via habeas corpus petition. Court held that the petition was disposed of as not pressed after the petitioner filed a memo stating no longer wish to continue the proceedings. No substantive direction was given.
No relief; WPCRL disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.36 of 2023
Sarojini Behera
…. Petitioner
Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and …. Opp. Parties another
Mr. Arupananda Das Addl. Government Advocate
Order No.
09.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
ORDER
03.10.2023
This matter is taken up through Hybrid
arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
In this writ petition in the nature of habeas corpus, the petitioner Sarojini Behera has prayed for a direction to the opposite parties nos.1 and 2, particularly, the opposite party no.2 to cause production of the victim girl.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that the victim girl has already been rescued and handed over to the C.W.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also files a memo stating therein that he does not want to press this WPCRL. The memo is taken on record.
// 2 //
Accordingly, the WPCRL is disposed of as not pressed.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
( S.S. Mishra) Judge
RKM
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: RABINDRA KUMAR MISHRA Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CU TTACK Date: 05-Oct-2023 12:29:06
Page 2 of 2
Sarojini Behera
State of Odisha
S.K. SAHOO
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
