The High Court of Orissa allowed the withdrawal of File No. 130 of 2023, a writ petition filed by Baruna Sarkar Saha against the Union of India (CBI).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.130 of 2023
Baruna Sarkar Saha
Petitioner
Mr. Milan Kanungo, Sr. Advocate.
-versus-
Union of India (C.B.I.)
Opp. Party
Mr. Sarthak Nayak, Special Public Prosecutor, CBI.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
ORDER
Order No.
25.09.2023
Heard Mr. Milan Kanungo, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Sarthak Nayak, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the CBI.
After arguing for a long time, learned counsel for
the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition.
The WPCRL is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
(S.K. Sahoo) Judge
(S.S. Mishra)
Judge
amit
// 2 //
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURTG OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 27-Sep-2023 12:52:44
Page 2 of 2
Baruna Sarkar Saha
Union of India (C.B.I.)
S.K. SAHOO
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
