Prakash Chandra Nahak v. Superitendent of Police, Ganjam
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPCRL No.125…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.125 of 2023
Prakash Chandra Nahak
Petitioner
Mr. L.C. Behera, Advocate.
-versus-
Superintendent of Police, …. Opp. Parties. Ganjam & others
Mr. Arupananda Das, Additional Government Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
ORDER
Order No.
12.09.2023
(video conferencing/physical mode).
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo in Court today stating therein that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and wants to withdraw the same. The memo is taken on record.
Considering the above memo, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(S.K. Sahoo) Judge
(S.S. Mishra)
Signature Not Verified Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTYamit Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CU TTACK Date: 13-Sep-2023 14:48:30
Prakash Chandra Nahak
Superintendent of Police
S.K. Sahoo
Sibo Sankar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court