A writ petition challenging an order of 1995 regarding educational services was dismissed due to the absence of instructions from the petitioner's counsel.
Writ petition dismissed due to lack of instructions from counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.C. (TAC) No.57 of 2015
Surendra Kumar Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. S.P. Nath, proxy counsel on behalf of Mr. B. Routray, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Nilambar Jena, Standing Counsel for S & ME Department
CORAM: JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER 13.01.2023
Order No. 1. Challenging the order dated 31st March, 1995 passed by the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, the Petitioner has filed the present petition.
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Laxmikant
Surendra Kumar Nayak
State of Odisha
M. S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
