Writ petition dismissed due to no instruction from petitioner to counsel. Liberty granted to file fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
Petitioner granted liberty to file fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C.(OAC) No. 4355 of 2016
Benu Madhab Naik …. Petitioner Mr. S. Behera, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties Mr. M.K. Balabantaray, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
28.07.2023 Order No 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of no instruction. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner to file a fresh Petition, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sneha
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 01-Aug-2023 11:15:42
Benu Madhab Naik
State of Odisha
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
