Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner failed to establish contact and express interest in pursuing the matter. Relief granted: liberty to file restoration application within one month.
Petitioner at liberty to file restoration application within one month if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC (OAC) No.3691 of 2012
Rabindra Bindhani
…. Petitioner
Mr. S. Pradhan, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. D. Mund, A.G.A.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Order No.
arrangement.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that despite his best efforts, he has not been able to establish contact with the Petitioner. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
3. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court by way of filing a restoration application within a period of one month, if any cause of action survives.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SUMITRA NAYAK Judge
Signed by: SUMITRA NAYAK Designation: Jr. Stenographer Ayaskanta/ Reason: Authentication Sumitra Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 12-Sep-2023 12:00:33
Page 1 of 1
Rabindra Bindhani
State of Odisha
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
SUMITRA NAYAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
