In a writ petition, the petitioner challenged recovery of house rent notices issued by the Sub-Collector of Kandhamal. The Court held that since the petitioner was transferred from a Non-KBK district, he was not entitled to the benefit extended to employees transferred to the KBK district, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No.2921 of 2014
Niranjan Mallick …. Petitioner None -versus…. State of Odisha & others. Opposite Parties Mr. Saswat Das, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 03.03.2023
1 of 1
// 2 //
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
MRS
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a state employee transferred from the Non-KBK district is entitled to house rent recovery notice benefits?
Whether this Court should interfere with recovery of house rent notices issued to the petitioner?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Niranjan Mallick
State of Odisha
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
