High Court disposed of the writ petition directed to Ombudsman-I (CESU). The court directed the petitioner to approach the distribution company for recalculation of delay payment surcharge before seeking further remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.916 of 2015
Sakuntala Aluminium Industries Pvt. …. Petitioner Ltd.
Mr.Falguni R.Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
OMBUDSMAN-I (CESU) & Another …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER 16.01.2023
Order No.
Power Central Odisha Distribution Company Ltd. with an appropriate application for recalculation of the delay payment surcharge and after following up on such representation, to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(M. S. Raman)
Judge
Aks
Sakuntala Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Ombudsman-I (CESU)
Dr. S. Muralidhar
M. S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
