Disposed

Ghosa Pangi v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC1 May 2023WP(C)/8954/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ application, the petitioner sought a direction to the opposite party to dispose of a pending representation. The single judge disposed of the matter at admission by directing the opposite party to consider the representation within eight weeks and pass a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

Directed Opposite Party No.2 to consider the pending representation within eight weeks from the date of the order and dispose of it by passing a speaking and reasoned order.

Ghosa Pangi Vs State of Odisha — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.8954 of 2023

¶3

Ghosa Pangi

¶4

…. Petitioner Mr.M.K.Mishra, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha and another

¶7

…. Opposite Parties Mr.T.Patnaik, A.S.C..

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

01.05.2023

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel.

¶16

The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:

¶17

“ It is therefore that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the Opp.Party No.2 and direct him to dispose of the representation under annexure-4 as early as possible, otherwise the Petitioner shall suffer irreparably.

¶18

And pass any other orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and prop for the ends of justice.”

¶19

In course of hearing of the writ application, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner ventilating her grievance has submitted representation before the General Manager ( H & A), National Aluminum Company Ltd., Opposite Party No.2 under Annexure-4. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is pending as of now. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of

¶20

// 2 //

¶21

the Petitioner under Annexure-4 within a stipulated period of time. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No.2, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time.

¶22

Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party no.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-4 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.2 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-4 by passing a speaking and reasoned order.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

¶24

RKS

¶25

( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge

Ghosa Pangi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghosa Pangi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somanath Barik Vs Anu Garg, I.A.S.

Uma Behera Vs Pradeep Kumar Pujari, in Charge Sub Treasury Officer, Koraput

Ramesh Chandra Deo Vs State of Odisha

Rasmita Kumari Mohanty Vs State of Odisha

Chandaneswar High School, Garhkharad Vs State of Odisha

Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra Vs State of Odisha