T.Geetanjali v. Allhabad Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition which was dismissed as infructuous since the disputed matter between the parties had been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8392 of 2017
T.Geetanjali
…. Petitioner
Mr.Ramdas Achary, Adv.
-versus-
Allhabad Bank & Anr.
…. Opp.Parties Mr.A.K.Mishra,Adv. (for O.P.No.1)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K.PANIGRAHI
Order No.
03
ORDER
04.04.2023
1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
(Dr.S.K.Panigrahi)
Judge
LB
Page 1 of 1
T.Geetanjali
Allhabad Bank
S.K.Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court