Baidyanath Sahoo v. Collector,Balasore
Case brief
What is this about?
Matter could not be proceeded with due to lack of instructions from the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8150 of 2012
Baidyanath Sahoo
….. Petitioners Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate
Vs.
Collector, Balasore & Others
Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
07.08.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
06.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no
instructions in the matter.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 08-Aug-2023 10:55:23
Page 1 of 1
Baidyanath Sahoo
Collector, Balasore & Others
B.R. Sarangi
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court