The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, noting the passage of time, but granted liberty to revive if cause of action survives.
Liberty granted to revive the application if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6354 of 2012
Dibya Lochana Behera and others Petitioners
…. Mr. Laxmidhar Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr.T.K.Patnaik, A.S.C..
CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
09.02.2023
RKS
Page 1 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous with the passage of time.
Dibya Lochana Behera and others
State of Orissa and others
A.K. Mahapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
