Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ram Ch.Majhi Vs Sunia Majhi — Orissa HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Ram Ch.Majhi Vs Sunia MajhiRam Ch.Majhi v. Sunia Majhi

Dismissed

Ram Ch.Majhi v. Sunia Majhi

Orissa HC16 Aug 2023WP(C)/4964/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called up.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C). NO.4964 OF 2013

Ram Ch. Majhi …. Petitioner

None

-versus-

Sunia Majhi and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. A.K. Panigrahi, Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

16.08.2023

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Ram Ch. Majhi
respondent
Sunia Majhi and others

Coram

AI extract

K.R. MOHAPATRA

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 16 Aug 2023 · August
Registered: 1 Mar 2013
Case no.: WP(C)/4964/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.r.mohapatra

Prakash Ku.Subudhi Vs Monalisa @Rubi
14 Aug 2023
Abdus Samee Vs J.K.Tripathy andORS.
14 Aug 2023
Sk.Kutub and Anr. Vs Abdul Rasid Khan
14 Aug 2023
Damodar Debata Vs Public Inform.Office
16 Aug 2023

Cite this judgement

Ram Ch.Majhi v. Sunia Majhi, WP(C)/4964/2013 (OD), decided on 16 August 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K.R. MOHAPATRA

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The court dismissed the filed writ petition as the petitioner was absent when the matter was called after lunch interval, resulting in the case being dismissed for want of prosecution.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.

At the first hour, a request was made to take up this matter after lunch interval. But none appears when the matter is called after lunch interval.

This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 18^th February, 2013 (Annexure-3) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rairangpur in C.S. No.38 of 2012, whereby an application filed by the Plaintiff-Opposite Party under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint, has been allowed.

Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties is present.

Since none appears for the Petitioner to pursue the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(K.R. Mohapatra) Signature Not Verified Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Rojalin Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 17-Aug-2023 18:02:45

Page 1 of 1

CNR

ODHC010046372013

Bench

Disposal

Dismissed For Default/Non-Prosecution

Chanchala Nayak Vs Sibo Pr.Choudhury

16 Aug 2023

Tarangini Kapardar Vs Guru Charan Debata

16 Aug 2023