Disposed

Lambodar Kar v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC22 Feb 2023WP(C)/4144/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of this writ petition by directing the competent authority to consider the petitioner's grievance regarding the grant of 3rd RACP as a representation, following a specific earlier appellate order.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of with direction to the competent authority to consider the petitioner's grievance regarding grant of 3rd RACP as a representation and take a lawful decision.

Lambodar Kar Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.4144 of 2023

¶3

Lambodar Kar

¶4

…. Petitioner Mr. R.C. Jena , Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. N.K. Praharaj, AGA

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

¶9

ORDER Order No. 22.02.2023 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶10

Order No.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶12

Looking to the prayer made in this Writ Petition, this Court observes that an administrative decision in the matter is required to be taken at the first hand. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider the grievance of the Petitioner in this Writ Petition in the matter of grant of 3^rd RACP, treating the same as a representation at the instance of the Petitioner and take a lawful decision thereon taking into account the decision of this Court in W.P.(C) No.2831 of 2016,

¶13

// 2 //

¶14

which has also been confirmed by the Hon’ble apex Court in Diary

¶15

No.(s) 20358 of 2017. This Court also records the submission of

¶16

learned counsel for the Petitioner that following the direction of this Court indicated hereinabove, there has been compliance of such direction in respect of similarly situated persons involving O.A. No.2237 of 2014 and batch of cases. Similar employee like the present Petitioner has given the benefit under Annexure-9 vide order

¶17

No.JES-PF-IPR-3031/2018 dated 20.10.2018 at page-33 to 35 of the

¶18

brief.

¶19

The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of one & half months from the date of communication of a copy of this order along with a copy of the Writ Petition by the Petitioner and also the order of this Court in W.P.(C) No.2831 of 2016 as well as the order of the Hon’ble apex Court in Diary No.(s) 20358 of 2017, by the Petitioner.

¶20

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

¶21

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge

¶22

Debasis

Lambodar Kar v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lambodar Kar v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amruta Priyambada Vs Chancellor,Ravensha

Ashok Ku.Meher Vs State

Sunil Kumar Bhanja Vs State of Odisha

Padmanava Panda Vs State and Ors.

Rabindra Kumar Nayak Vs State of Orissa

Anama Charan Mallik Vs State of Odisha