The Single Judge discharged the present writ petition by directing the petitioners to approach the Lokayukta with an appropriate application regarding their grievance.
The petition was disposed permitting the petitioners to approach the Lokayukta with an appropriate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 36086 of 2022
Laxmidhar Jena and another …. Petitioners
Mr. Bipin Kumar Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Ishwar Mohanty Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER 02.01.2023 Order No. 01. 1. Given the subject matter of the grievance, the Court is of the view that the Petitioners should approach the Lokayukta with an appropriate application.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge
S. Behera
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievance raised by the petitioners falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court or the Lokayukta.
Laxmidhar Jena
State of Odisha
M. S. Raman
S. Behera
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
