Bidyadhar Mohanta v. Special Land Acquisi
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed no instructions. Writ petition disposed of for want of instruction without substantive hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.3190 of 2013
Bidyadhar Mohanta
….. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Satapathy, Advocate
Vs.
Special land Acquisition Officer- ….. cum-Competent Authority, National Highway & others
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
01.08.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
06.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he has no
instruction in the matter.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
MRS JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 01-Aug-2023 15:57:19
Bidyadhar Mohanta
Special land Acquisition Officer and others
B.R. Sarangi
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court