Petitioner filed a writ petition but expressed lack of desire to press the matter via counsel; the court accordingly dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27961 of 2019
Santosh Kumar Jena …. Petitioner Mr. N. Sahani, Adv. -versus-
…. Branch –in- Charge, Balasore Opposite Party Branch, Hinduja Leyland Finance,Balasore
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Order ORDER
No. 17.07.2023
1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid
arrangement.
2 . Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo
stating therein that he does not want to press this
petition, which is kept on record.
3. In view of the above memo filed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Signature Not Verified
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMITRA NAYAK Judge Designation: Jr. Stenographer L.B./Sumitra Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 31-Jul-2023 18:33:39
Page 1 of 1
Santosh Kumar Jena
Branch – in Charge, Balasore Opposite Party Branch, Hinduja Leyland Finance, Balasore
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
