Disposed
Nagen Sahu v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/2705/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2705 of 2023
Nagen Sahu
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
02.02.2023
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3 . The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:-
“Under the circumstances, it is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a direction to the Opp. Party No. 3 to take a decision in view of the letter No. 814, dtd.11.11.2022 of the opp. Party No. 5 under Annexure-2 to this writ application regarding payment of compensation to the Petitioner within a stipulated time and if the Petitioner’s family is eligible for any compensation, the same be paid immediately.
And pass any other order(s)/direction(s) as would be deemed fit and proper in these circumstances justify;
And for which act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has filed an application
// 2 //
at Annexure-2 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No. 3, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 3 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 3 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.
6 . The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sneha
Page 2 of 2
Nagen Sahu
State of Odisha & Ors.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court