Petitioner's counsel submitted that a prayer in the Writ Petition became infructuous as the benefits were extended during pendency; the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25832 of 2020
Sarat Chandra Patra
….. Petitioner
Mr. T.P. Tripathy, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha
….. Opposite Parties
Mr. P. Bharadwaj, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
22.06.2023
Order No.
The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
withdrawn.
(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE
padma
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PADMA CHARAN DASH Designation: Secretary In-Charge Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 26-Jun-2023 10:27:28
Sarat Chandra Patra
State of Odisha
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
