In W.P.(C) No.25633 of 2017, the High Court disposed of a second instance constitutional writ petition before Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, noting that the dispute between the petitioner and respondents had been settled out of court via a joint memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25633 of 2017
Hena Dei Alias Sethi
…. Petitioner
-versus-
Chief Executive Officer, CESSU, BBSR & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No
24.01.2023
05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. During pendency of the matter the dispute has been settled out of the Court and a joint memo is filed to that effect in Court today. The same be kept on record.
4. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of in the light of the settlement arrived at between the Parties.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sneha
Hena Dei Alias Sethi
Chief Executive Officer, CESSU, BBSR & Ors.
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
