Petitioner sought relief in a writ petition. It is agreed that the issue was analogous to a previous dismissed petition. Following that prior order, the current writ petition was dismissed without detailed analysis of the present facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.22636 of 2016
Rabindra Kumar Mohapatra
Petitioner Mr. D.K. Panda, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & others
Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
16.08.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 04.
and the learned counsel for the State.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANTReason: Authentication (M.S. RAMAN) Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack MRS JUDGE Date: 16-Aug-2023 14:39:46
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukanti Mohapatra and others vrs. State of Odisha and anotherFollowed¶17
W.P.(C) No.3071 of 2017 (Sukanti Mohapatra and others vrs. State of Odisha and another)
Rabindra Kumar Mohapatra
State of Odisha
B.R. SARANGI
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
