In a writ petition seeking direction to alienate fragmented land via a Power of Attorney, the petitioners withdrew the petition during hearing. The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) NO.22487 OF 2023 Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra and others …. Petitioners Mr. Dillip Kumar Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
14.11.2023
2 . The Petitioners in this writ petition pray for a direction to alienate the fragmentation of land by virtue of Annexure-1, Power of Attorney.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
bks
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BIJAY KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 17-Nov-2023 10:45:03
Page 1 of 1
Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra and others
State of Odisha and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
