High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the Petitioners were absent when called upon, without reaching the merits of the rejection appeal.
Writ petition dismissed for prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA CU TTACK Date: 01-Nov-2023 18:33:20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21082 of 2023
Manoj Kumar Sethi and another
…. Petitioners
None
-versus-
Union of India and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Deepak Gochhayat, CGC (For Opposite Party No.1) Mr. Srinivas Patnaik, Advocate (For HPCL-OP Nos.2 and 3)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
01.11.2023
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
// 2 //
Digitally Signed Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA CU TTACK Date: 01-Nov-2023 18:33:20
Issue urgent certified copy of the order on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 2 of 2
Manoj Kumar Sethi
Another
Union of India
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
K.R. Mohapatra
Sasanka Sekhar Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
