Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Binapani Sahu Vs State and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Binapani Sahu Vs State and Ors.Binapani Sahu v. State and Ors.

Disposed

Binapani Sahu v. State and Ors.

Orissa HC13 Feb 2023WP(C)/20642/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to lapse of time, with liberty granted to revive application if cause of action survives.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to revive the application if the cause of action survives.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.20642 of 2012

Binapani Sahu Petitioner

Mr.S.P.Dash, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa and others

…. Opposite Parties

Mr.R.N.Mishra, A.G.A.

CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

13.02.2023

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Binapani Sahu
respondent
State of Orissa

Coram

AI extract

A.K. Mohapatra

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 13 Feb 2023 · February
Registered: 30 Oct 2012
Case no.: WP(C)/20642/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Nargish Bahar Vs State and Ors.
10 Feb 2023
Padmanava Panda Vs State and Ors.
10 Feb 2023
M/S.Sri Debaranjan Vs M/S.Odisha S.Civil
10 Feb 2023
Jamuna Mohanta Vs State and Ors.
13 Feb 2023

Cite this judgement

Binapani Sahu v. State and Ors., WP(C)/20642/2012 (OD), decided on 13 February 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A.K. Mohapatra

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Liberty granted to revive the application if the cause of action survives.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous with the passage of time. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the application in the event the cause of action still survives.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

On perusal of the prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that the matter has become infructuous with the passage of time.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to revive this application in the event cause of action still survives.

(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge

RKS

Page 1 of 2

CNR

ODHC010016022012

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Disposal

Disposed Off

Ananta Ku.Women Self Vs State and Ors.

13 Feb 2023

Sudhakar Rout Vs State and Ors.

13 Feb 2023