Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Manoranjan Sahu Vs State — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Manoranjan Sahu Vs StateManoranjan Sahu v. State

Disposed

Manoranjan Sahu v. State

Orissa HC1 May 2023WP(C)/20274/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This high court disposed of a writ petition by the petitioner for want of instruction because his counsel reported no instructions on the matter.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.20274 of 2014

Manoranjan Sahu & others

….. Petitioners

Mr. Satyajit Behera, Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha & others

Opposite Parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN

ORDER

01.05.2023

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Manoranjan Sahu
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

DR. B.R. SARANGI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 1 May 2023 · May
Registered: 17 Oct 2014
Case no.: WP(C)/20274/2014

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi Murahari Sri Raman

Gaurav Electricals Vs Mstc
27 Apr 2023
M/S.Dr.Rehan Ice Plant Vs Ao,Canara Bank,Kendrapara
27 Apr 2023
Akash Putel Vs State of Odisha
27 Apr 2023
Pathani Panda Vs State of Orissa
1 May 2023

Cite this judgement

Manoranjan Sahu v. State, WP(C)/20274/2014 (OD), decided on 1 May 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

DR. B.R. SARANGI and M.S. RAMAN

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition stands disposed of for want of instruction. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated they have no instruction in the matter, and the court had no basis to proceed further.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that he has no instruction in the matter.

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of
for want of instruction.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) MRS JUDGE MANOR Digitally signed by ANJAN MANORANJAN SAMAL SAMAL Date: 2023.05.01 17:19:29 +05'30'

M.S. RAMAN

CNR

ODHC010002782014

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

B.r.sarangi Murahari Sri Raman

Disposal

Disposed Off

Ranjan Kumar Beura Vs Susil Kumar Samal, Junior Engnr., Cum in Charge of Asst. Excutive Engr.,Nh Sub Division, Angul

1 May 2023

M.Gourinatha Vs Ajit Ku.Tripathy

1 May 2023